The second name is that of Margaret
Tuttle. There appears to be no documentation for the claim that
this was the name of Samuel’s wife. An article in THE ADVOCATE
of Mt. Sterling, Kentucky written by Mrs. Hazel M. Boyd in 1981
says that “a correspondent” of hers stated that it
was Margaret Tuttle, but offers no other proof. Even if this person
did find a document with the name “Tuttle,” that could
simply be a transcriber’s error. The reason I think it to
be an error is that during the time and in the areas where Samuel
was born and raised, and where he likely was married, there were
no Tuttle families. The first mention of a Tuttle individual living
in an area anywhere near the Whitsitt’s is in western Pennsylvania
and dated long after Samuel and Margaret removed from Pennsylvania
for Kentucky. In contrast, there were numerous Tittle’s
in all of the areas where Samuel lived, from Lebanon Township
in Lancaster County to Westmoreland County. We have discussed
Peter Tittle, both father and son, in our sketch of Samuel’s
father Ralph. Tittle family researchers tell us that Peter Tittle
Sr. had brothers George and John who came to America and settled
in northern Lancaster County at about the same time as the Whitsett’s.
In the documents of Lebanon Township and the church records of
Rev. Stoever we found several other Tittle names including women
Elizabeth and Rachel and a child named John Peter Tittle.
Thirdly, I have my own theories about
the name “Varner.” While discussing Ralph Whiteside/Whitsitt
above, we mentioned Robert Varner/Vernor who was Ralph’s
close neighbor. The Varner name shows up in Lancaster County documents
as Varner, Vernor, Verner and Varnar. Some of this family settled
in northern Lancaster County after coming to America from Ireland.
Later they seemed to have followed the same path as the Whitsitt
and Tittle families to Cumberland and even later to Westmoreland
and Fayette Counties. A Google search of the Internet turns up
several links for the family history and genealogy of the Verner/Varner
family. I do not want to get into the family history of the Varner
family except to illustrate my point, so I haven’t included
here specific sources. A simple search using Google will give
you enough sources to back up my statements. The Varner name was
originally Werner a German variant of Warner. The family came
to Northern Ireland from Germany; probably about the time the
Whiteside/Whitsitt families arrived there. Because of the German
pronunciation of “W” as “V” Warner or
Werner was written as “Varner” and “Verner”
(and a few other variations). This occurred first in Ireland and
continued in America. What does this have to do with us? During
the era when Samuel Varner Whitsitt (junior) was born, it was
a common practice to give at least one child the mother’s
maiden name, sometimes as a first name, but usually as a middle
name. While contemplating the coincidence of a Varner being the
neighbor of Samuel, Sr. when he was young, I began to think that
perhaps Margaret was Widow Tittle when she married Samuel and
her maiden name was Varner. According to the birth dates of their
children, they must have been married in either Cumberland or
York County, Pennsylvania. Margaret may have first married one
of the several Tittle young men in Lancaster or Cumberland County;
her husband dying soon after, perhaps before any Tittle children
were born of the union. Margaret Varner-Tittle then married Samuel
about 1766 at about the time Samuel first gained a warrant for
survey of land in York County. I readily admit that this is all
conjecture and will probably remain so unless marriage records,
a probate record or some other form of solid documentation is
found.
Various researchers have given Samuel,
Sr. birth dates ranging from the early 1740’s to as late
as the 1760’s. His birthplace has ranged from Northern Ireland,
to Virginia. A few have placed it in Lancaster County. None that
I know about have given a specific source to prove either the
date or the place. Family legend supports the theory that he was
born in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania and the most likely date
seems to be about 1746.
The first record of Samuel is his land
warrant application on April 10, 1767. The warrant register lists
his name as Samuel Whitsitt and the land was 300 acres located
in Fairfield Township, formerly Newbury Township, York County,
Pennsylvania. A survey for a portion of the land was done many
years later. In 1833, when this final survey was made, the land
belonged to Jacob Stromenger. The survey indicates that at least
part of the tract had been annexed into a warrant for Abraham
Norblett originally issued in April 1760. It is not clear to me
what the significance is of that fact; does it mean that Samuel
eventually walked away from the land or did he sell at least a
portion of it to Norblett when he left York County.
Eight years later, Samuel’s brother
Joseph had his tract surveyed on April 7, 1773. The survey was
based on his warrant of April 1, 1773. The survey shows that Joseph’s
land was adjacent to Samuel’s on the west side and was located
on Yellow Breeches Creek very near where Ralph Whitsett had his
mill on the opposite side of the creek in Cumberland County. Also
adjoining Joseph’s land on the south side was that of Peter
Tittle.
Samuel must have left York County for
Westmoreland about the same time that his brother Joseph took
out his warrant. Westmoreland County was created by an act of
the government of the Colony of Pennsylvania on February 26, 1773.
Hanna’s Town was selected as the temporary county seat of
Westmoreland County, chosen over Pittsburgh. Robert Hanna, also
from York County, laid out the town on his land. The usual size
of the lot was 60’ by 120’ and the cost was about
2 pounds. The buyer also had to pay an annual quit rent of 15
shillings. The new owner was required to build a house of a certain
size on his lot within two years. These early deeds are recorded
in Westmoreland County Deeds, Book A. One of the reasons we have
not found any warrants or surveys for Samuel, or his brother William,
may be that they purchased one of these town lots rather than
farm land. If so, those deeds were probably recorded in Deed Book
A.
Westmoreland County, when it was created,
encompassed all of the counties in today’s southwestern
Pennsylvania. It was also a difficult place for white settlers.
In 1774 a number of petitions, all with similar wording, circulated
among the settlers in western Pennsylvania asking the Governor
for protection from Indians. The signatures of a group in Westmoreland
County contain the names of Samuel Whiteside, Robert Hanna and
one hundred thirty-two others.
"The people of the border counties
assembled and petitioned Governor John Penn, setting forth "that
there was great reason to apprehend that the country would again
be immediately involved in all the horrors of an Indian war; that
their circumstances, at that critical time, were truly alarming;
deserted by the greater part of our neighbors and fellow subjects,
unprotected with places of strength to resort to with ammunition,
provisions, and with almost every other necessary store. Our houses
abandoned to pillage; labor and industry entirely at a stand;
our crops destroyed by cattle; our flocks dispersed; the minds
of our people distracted with the terrors of falling, along with
the helpless and unprotected families, the immediate victims of
savage barbarity. In the midst of these scenes of desolation and
ruin, next to the Almighty, we look to your Honor, hoping, from
your known benevolence and humanity, such protection and relief
as your Honor shall see meet."
By December 1774 Samuel was the goalkeeper
in Hanna’s Town. He soon found himself caught up in the
border dispute with Virginia over the authority of Virginia to
collect taxes in Westmoreland County. Lord Dunmore governor of
Virginia sent his tax collectors into Westmoreland County. When
some residents resisted because they believed themselves to be
citizens of Pennsylvania, the Virginia tax collectors would often
break into the house and take anything they could find of value,
sometimes causing injuries to the occupants of the house. These
troubles led up to what became known as Dunmore’s War, considered
by some to be the first shots of the American Revolution. In 1774
Lord Dunmore issued a proclamation declaring Virginia’s
claim to all of the territory that included today’s Fayette,
Greene, Washington and Allegheny Counties in western Pennsylvania.
Lord Dunmore sent John Connolly to the area to enforce his edict.
Connolly raised a militia force in Virginia and marched to Fort
Pitt (Pittsburgh) and took control of the Fort. Connolly changed
the name of Fort Pitt to Fort Dunmore. Justice of the Peace for
Westmoreland County, General Arthur St. Clair raised militia,
built forts and blockhouses, and regained Fort Pitt. Westmoreland
County officials arrested Connolly and jailed him at Hanna’s
Town. He was released after posting bail but he soon returned
to Hanna’s Town with more than one hundred fifty men. He
arrested some county officials and took them back to Virginia.
That fall he again returned to Hanna’s Town and released
all of the prisoners in the goal in Hanna’s Town, including
two murderers. The motivation seems to have been that some of
the prisoners were Virginia tax collectors arrested for breaking
into people’s houses. Because of the trouble, not many crops
were planted that year and the severe winter of 1774-75 caused
serious problems for the settlers in Westmoreland.
On December 24, 1774 Connolly and his
group confronted Samuel Whitsitt, who was the goalkeeper in Hanna’s
Town. After the incident, Samuel made the following deposition
before Justices Robert Hanna and Arthur St. Clair.
"Before us Robert Hanna and
Arthur St. Clair, Esquires, two of his majesty's Justices for
Westmoreland County, personally appeared Samuel Whiteside, keeper
of the Goal of the said County, and being duly sworn according
to Law, deposeth and saith: that on this Instant, twenty-forth
of December, a number of armed Men came to the Goal of said County,
and ordered him to open the Prison Doors, and turn out a certain
William Thomas, then in his Custody on sundry Executions; that
he believes a certain William Christy and Simon Girty, who seemed
to be Officers from their dress, were at the head of their party;
That he, this deponent, refused to deliver his prisoner or open
the door where he was confined; that they then talked of throwing
down the house, when a certain Major Conolly came up, enquired
who resisted the releasment of the prisoners, threatened to tie
and carry off him this deponent; ordered the party to fire their
pieces against the house, and strip off the roof, on which he,
(this deponent) being afraid of ill consequences, both to his
person and property, did open the door to allow the prisoner to
speak to the party, and one of them rushed in, seized him [William
Thomas], and dragged him out, and also turned out a certain William
Dawson, who was likewise in his custody on execution, and that
it was Conolly himself who laid hands on Thomas and dragged him
out.”
A few weeks later, on February 7, 1775
Samuel was again confronted with the same situation. That same
day he made another deposition to the Justices of Westmoreland
county:
“Deposition of Samuel Whitesitt,
7 Feb. 1775, Westmoreland County. Personally appeared before us,
the subscribers, three of his Majesty's Justices of the Peace
for the county aforesaid, Samuel Whitesides, who being duly Sworn
upon the holy Evangelists of Almighty God, did depose & say
that this day being the Seventh day of February, in the morning
between twilight, there came a number of Armed men, and with a
large Sledge, about ten poundweight, broke open the outside Goal
door & one of the Inside doors, both being lock'd and sent
the prisoners then in the Goal, being three in number, who were
commited (one by Name of John Neil for a Riot & throwing down
a man's house, (with a number of others) the other two by Name
Samuel Wardin & Samuel Wilson, who were committed for a Trespass)
of and giving each of them the prisoners after the Goal being
broke a Pistol, and told them, the prisoners, that they had help'd
them so far, and to Clear their own way: and the said Samuel Whitsides
further says, that he heard the number of armed men aforesaid
say that for their so doing they had orders from Captain William
Crawford… [signed Samuel Whitesitt]. Carnachan, Esquire,
Sheriff of the County, … [asked] one Benjamin Harrison,
who appeared to be their head man, whether they had orders for
their so doing … and he read a paper & said it was Captain
William Crawford's orders. Foreman also saw one Samuel Wilson
make a push at Robert Hanna, Esquire (one of the Justices of the
Peace) with a Gun. [Robert Hanna’s statement] The sledge
was stolen from the smith shop. William McGeery came to Robt.
Hanna about daybreak to inform him of the break in. "One
Benjamin Harrison said, "What they had done they did by Authority
from Virginia."
Justice William Crawford who had ordered
the raid was the same William Crawford who some claim
was the uncle of Hadessa Crawford Whitsett, wife of William Wirt
Whitsett (see below)*. This
makes me wonder which side the Whitsitt’s were really on.
It could be that Samuel’s depositions were his attempt to
mitigate his role in the affair. One of the reasons for the strong
feelings in this dispute was because some of the Westmoreland
County settlers had obtained their land under the authority of
Virginia, rather than Pennsylvania. Others had warrants issued
by the Colony of Pennsylvania. Sometimes these claims overlapped,
which was always a sure-fire formula for violence. I have read
somewhere that many of the land records for grants from Virginia
for land in Westmoreland and Washington Counties, Pennsylvania
were recorded in Virginia and not Pennsylvania. This may be the
reason we have not found land records in Westmoreland County for
Samuel or William Whitsitt. It may also explain why some descendants
have claimed that the brothers Samuel, William and Joseph were
from or born in Virginia.
In May, 1775, anticipating a war with
Britain, the two sides put aside their differences, at least temporarily.
In that year men of Virginia and men of Pennsylvania produced
the Hanna’s Town Resolves, declaring in no uncertain terms
that they would take up arms to defend their rights against British
oppression. Hanna’s Town became the center for recruitment
of militia to fight the British and their Indian allies in Ohio
and Detroit.
Whether or not Samuel favored the authorities
of Pennsylvania or Virginia, he was one of the signatories of
a petition to Governor John Penn of Pennsylvania pleading that
the Governor return troops to Hanna’s Town for the protection
of its citizens. The petition is undated but appears to have been
organized about 1781-82. Hanna’s Town was completely destroyed
by Indians acting with the blessing of the British on July 13,
1782, almost a year after Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown.
The official end of the war came another year later in September
1783 with the Treaty of Paris. Several of these petitions, worded
exactly the same were sent to Governor Penn. Most had more than
twenty signatures. Among the signatures were Samuel Whitsitt and
Robert Clifford. Clifford was the brother of Mary Clifford who
married Joseph Whitsett, Samuel’s brother. The petition
reads as follows.
“To the Hornorable John Penn
Governor in and over the province of Pennsylvania, and the counties
of Newcastle, Kent and Sussex on the Delaware; The Petition of
Sundry of the inhabitants of Westmoreland County--- Humbly showeth,
That your petitioners in consequence of the first Alarum in these
parts, did assemble at Hanna's Town; where at their own expense
they Erected a Small Fortification as a shelter for their Wives
and Families during the Troublesome times, and under the direction
of the Gentlemen of the Association Voluntarily took up arms for
the general defense of this part of the country, 'till such times
as your Honor and the Honble Assembly were pleased to approve
our proceedings. Your Petitioners thought themselves extremely
happy and Secure, when your Honor Assembly so considerately order'd
a number of troops to be embodied for our General protection and
Safety; but your petitioners are now rendered very uneasy, by
the removal of these troops, Their Arms and Ammunition, on which
your Petitioners further understand are ordered to the Kittaning,
a place at least distant from any of the settlements, Twenty five
or Thirty miles. Your Petitioners by being left thus exposed without
Arms or Ammunition, humbly conceive themselves to be in great
Danger from the Enemy, and are sorry to observe to your Honor
and the Honble Assembly, that 'tis the General, as well as the
humble opinion of your Petitioners, that removing the troops to
so distant and uninhabited a part of the Province as the Kittaning,
cannot answer the good purpose for which they were intended, but
appears calculated only by the advice of some who prefer their
own private interest to the Public Welfare. Your Petitioners are
further most humbly of the opinion, that some ill disposed person
or persons have misrepresented our real Situation to your Honor
and the Honble Assembly, otherwise we could not conceive that
Your Honor and the Honble Assembly would leave us exposed and
de fenceless in the manner we now are. Your Petitioners therefore
most humbly request that your Honor would be pleased to consider
their alarming Situation, and order such assistance as their Defenseless
condition requires. And your Petitioners as in duty bound shall
pray &ea, &ea.”